RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon X700

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X700 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

ATI X700
2004
128 MB DDR, 44 Watt
0.19

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms ATI X700 by a whopping 33463% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.3033.63
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV410AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed400 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors120 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200417.6
Floating-point processing powerno data26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X700 0.19
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 63.77
+33463%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X700 72
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24572
+34028%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 63.77
Recency 1 September 2004 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 130 Watt

ATI X700 has 195.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 33463.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon X700 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X700
Radeon X700
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 48 votes

Rate Radeon X700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.