GeForce RTX 3070 vs ATI Radeon X700 PRO

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon X700 PRO and GeForce RTX 3070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI X700 PRO
2004
128 MB GDDR3, 33 Watt
0.19

RTX 3070 outperforms ATI X700 PRO by a whopping 29063% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking139944
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.95
Power efficiency0.4218.16
ArchitectureR400 (2004−2008)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV410GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2004 (20 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

ATI X700 PRO and RTX 3070 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5888
Core clock speed425 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors120 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate3.400317.4
Floating-point processing powerno data20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs8184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed430 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth13.76 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b (9_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X700 PRO 0.19
RTX 3070 55.41
+29063%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X700 PRO 75
RTX 3070 22314
+29652%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1150
1440p-0−198
4K-0−164

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.33
1440pno data5.09
4Kno data7.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 149
+0%
149
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+0%
147
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 135
+0%
135
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 311
+0%
311
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Metro Exodus 124
+0%
124
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Valorant 246
+0%
246
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Dota 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Fortnite 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+0%
256
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Dota 2 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 237
+0%
237
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
World of Tanks 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 166
+0%
166
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Metro Exodus 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 208
+0%
208
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+0%
115
+0%
Metro Exodus 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 116
+0%
116
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 55.41
Recency 1 September 2004 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 220 Watt

ATI X700 PRO has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 29063.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X700 PRO in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X700 PRO
Radeon X700 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon X700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11721 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.