GeForce MX330 vs ATI Radeon X1900 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameR580N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 May 2006 (18 years ago)20 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed575 MHz1531 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1594 MHz
Number of transistors384 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate6.90038.26
Floating-point performanceno data1.224 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1900 GT 145
GeForce MX330 2433
+1578%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2006 20 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX330 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1900 GT and GeForce MX330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1900 GT is a desktop card while GeForce MX330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1900 GT
Radeon X1900 GT
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GeForce MX330

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 28 votes

Rate Radeon X1900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2123 votes

Rate GeForce MX330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.