UHD Graphics 710 Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1800 GTO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1275not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.52no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameR520Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 2006 (18 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors321 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.00011.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPs124
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed495 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth31.68 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2006 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1800 GTO and UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1800 GTO is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1800 GTO
Radeon X1800 GTO
Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 12 votes

Rate Radeon X1800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.