Iris Plus Graphics 950 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.27
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV535Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 November 2007 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed587 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors330 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.34832.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed695 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.24 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 80 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 950 has a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 193.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1700 FSC and Iris Plus Graphics 950. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1700 FSC
Radeon X1700 FSC
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 950
Iris Plus Graphics 950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1700 FSC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 12 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.