FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon X1650 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRV560Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 October 2006 (18 years ago)1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1440
Core clock speed525 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors330 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20050.40
Floating-point processing powerno data2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.0
OpenGL2.04.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2006 1 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 150 Watt

ATI X1650 XT has 172.7% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 XT and FireStream 9350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1650 XT is a desktop card while FireStream 9350 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 XT
Radeon X1650 XT
AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.