Arc A780 vs ATI Radeon X1650 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1374not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.35no data
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV530DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2007 (17 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed600 MHz2200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors157 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400563.2
Floating-point processing powerno data18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs4256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1093 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s559.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 200 Watt

ATI X1650 PRO has 354.5% lower power consumption.

Arc A780, on the other hand, has a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 PRO and Arc A780. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO
Intel Arc A780
Arc A780

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 69 votes

Rate Arc A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.