Edge 3D 2200XL vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)no data
GPU code nameRV530NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 December 2007 (16 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed587 MHz60 MHz
Number of transistors157 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm500 nm
Texture fill rate2.3480.06
ROPs41
TMUs41

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data191 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DRAM
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed392 MHz60 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.54 GB/s480 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)1.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0N/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 December 2007 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 500 nm

ATI X1650 GTO has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 455.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1650 GTO and Edge 3D 2200XL. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
Radeon X1650 GTO
NVIDIA Edge 3D 2200XL
Edge 3D 2200XL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Edge 3D 2200XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.