GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1324not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.50no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV530G80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)19 November 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data112
Core clock speed590 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors157 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.36028.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs420
TMUs428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB640 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed690 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.08 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 19 November 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 640 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 150 Watt

ATI X1600 XT has 257.1% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 112, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 XT and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Radeon X1600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 308 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.