AeroBox GPU vs ATI Radeon X1300 XT AGP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Kryptos
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 August 2006 (18 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed500 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)22 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00055.16
Floating-point processing powerno data1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2006 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 22 Watt 100 Watt

ATI X1300 XT AGP has 354.5% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 XT AGP and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 XT AGP is a desktop card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 XT AGP
Radeon X1300 XT AGP
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.