Arc Pro A60M vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1371not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.49no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRV515DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors107 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400166.4
Floating-point processing powerno data5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 95 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO has 206.5% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO is a desktop card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Radeon X1300 PRO
Intel Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.