Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI X1050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.21
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRV370Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2006 (17 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed400 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2331 MHz
Number of transistors107 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600111.9
Floating-point processing powerno data3.58 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs448
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1050 49
Pro W6400 8081
+16392%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2006 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 50 Watt

ATI X1050 has 108.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W6400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1050 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.