Quadro P600 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Vega Frontier Edition with Quadro P600, including specs and performance data.

Vega Frontier Edition
2017
16 GB HBM2, 300 Watt
34.51
+307%

Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Quadro P600 by a whopping 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking139470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.119.31
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10GP107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)14 November 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $178
Current price$961 (1x MSRP)$207 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P600 has 52% better value for money than Vega Frontier Edition.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096384
Core clock speed1382 MHz1430 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate409.637.37
Floating-point performance13,107 gflops1,117 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s64.13 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Vega Frontier Edition 34.51
+307%
Quadro P600 8.48

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Quadro P600 by 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Vega Frontier Edition 13326
+307%
Quadro P600 3274

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Quadro P600 by 307% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Vega Frontier Edition 75849
+619%
Quadro P600 10546

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Quadro P600 by 619% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Vega Frontier Edition 73760
+659%
Quadro P600 9721

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition outperforms Quadro P600 by 659% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+295%
43
−295%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+285%
24−27
−285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+282%
16−18
−282%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+295%
18−20
−295%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+290%
40−45
−290%
Hitman 3 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+305%
35−40
−305%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+300%
24−27
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+285%
24−27
−285%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+306%
30−35
−306%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+285%
24−27
−285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+282%
16−18
−282%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+295%
18−20
−295%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+290%
40−45
−290%
Hitman 3 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+305%
35−40
−305%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+300%
24−27
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+285%
24−27
−285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+300%
25
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+306%
30−35
−306%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+282%
16−18
−282%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+295%
18−20
−295%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+290%
40−45
−290%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+305%
35−40
−305%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+285%
24−27
−285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+293%
14
−293%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+306%
30−35
−306%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Hitman 3 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Hitman 3 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%

This is how Vega Frontier Edition and Quadro P600 compete in popular games:

  • Vega Frontier Edition is 295% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.51 8.48
Recency 27 June 2017 14 November 2017
Cost $999 $178
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 25 Watt

The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is a desktop card while Quadro P600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 25 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 152 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.