T600 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data29.22
ArchitectureGCN 1.4 (2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640
Core clock speed1500 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate409.653.40
Floating-point processing powerno data1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1886 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth482.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 40 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition Liquid has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 837.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and T600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA T600
T600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 680 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.