UHD Graphics 630 vs Radeon VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII and UHD Graphics 630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
42.62
+1284%

VII outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 1284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93771
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.89no data
Power efficiency10.0214.22
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega 20Comet Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (6 years ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840184
Core clock speed1400 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors13,230 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate420.026.45
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs643
TMUs24023

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Radeon VII 42.62
+1284%
UHD Graphics 630 3.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16481
+1283%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon VII 37881
+2017%
UHD Graphics 630 1790

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+706%
UHD Graphics 630 7704

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon VII 27449
+2167%
UHD Graphics 630 1211

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 146094
+1391%
UHD Graphics 630 9798

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 430170
+304%
UHD Graphics 630 106362

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Radeon VII 110
+624%
UHD Graphics 630 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Radeon VII 87
+203%
UHD Graphics 630 29

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Radeon VII 19
+470%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Radeon VII 170
+963%
UHD Graphics 630 16

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Radeon VII 62
+342%
UHD Graphics 630 14

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Radeon VII 52
+1561%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Radeon VII 17
+5533%
UHD Graphics 630 0

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Radeon VII 159
+894%
UHD Graphics 630 16

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Radeon VII 52
+1587%
UHD Graphics 630 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Radeon VII 175
+1285%
UHD Graphics 630 13

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Radeon VII 167
+1225%
UHD Graphics 630 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125
+594%
18
−594%
1440p81
+710%
10
−710%
4K60
+757%
7
−757%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59no data
1440p8.63no data
4K11.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+1400%
8
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+922%
9−10
−922%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+1760%
5
−1760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+1614%
7−8
−1614%
Battlefield 5 136
+1260%
10−11
−1260%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+922%
9−10
−922%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+1450%
6−7
−1450%
Far Cry 5 99
+1550%
6
−1550%
Fortnite 195
+1200%
14−16
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+1064%
14−16
−1064%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2240%
5−6
−2240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 157
+1108%
12−14
−1108%
Valorant 230−240
+400%
45−50
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+1614%
7−8
−1614%
Battlefield 5 137
+1270%
10−11
−1270%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+922%
9−10
−922%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+859%
29
−859%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+1450%
6−7
−1450%
Dota 2 160
+662%
21
−662%
Far Cry 5 95
+1483%
6−7
−1483%
Fortnite 154
+927%
14−16
−927%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+1021%
14−16
−1021%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2240%
5−6
−2240%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+1486%
7
−1486%
Metro Exodus 88
+2833%
3
−2833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 158
+1115%
12−14
−1115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+1444%
9−10
−1444%
Valorant 230−240
+400%
45−50
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 127
+1170%
10−11
−1170%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+922%
9−10
−922%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+1450%
6−7
−1450%
Dota 2 147
+674%
19
−674%
Far Cry 5 91
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+829%
14−16
−829%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2240%
5−6
−2240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+733%
9−10
−733%
Valorant 197
+328%
45−50
−328%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 114
+660%
14−16
−660%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1200%
21−24
−1200%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Metro Exodus 56
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+695%
21−24
−695%
Valorant 260−270
+829%
27−30
−829%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+1343%
7−8
−1343%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+1820%
5−6
−1820%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1529%
7−8
−1529%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+2233%
3−4
−2233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+1420%
5−6
−1420%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+2000%
5−6
−2000%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Metro Exodus 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Valorant 240−250
+1507%
14−16
−1507%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Dota 2 78
+1014%
7
−1014%
Far Cry 5 59
+1867%
3−4
−1867%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
+1350%
4−5
−1350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+1000%
4−5
−1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how Radeon VII and UHD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 594% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 710% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 757% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon VII is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is ahead in 60 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.62 3.08
Recency 7 February 2019 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon VII has a 1283.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1866.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2871 vote

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4091 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon VII or UHD Graphics 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.