Quadro FX 3700M vs Radeon VII

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII with Quadro FX 3700M, including specs and performance data.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
43.17
+3558%

VII outperforms FX 3700M by a whopping 3558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.780.02
Power efficiency10.201.10
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega 20G92
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date7 February 2019 (5 years ago)14 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $925

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon VII has 128800% better value for money than FX 3700M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840128
Core clock speed1400 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate420.035.20
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS0.352 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs24064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-HE
Length280 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 43.17
+3558%
FX 3700M 1.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16654
+3552%
FX 3700M 456

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128
+1130%
FX 3700M 5053

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD123
+4000%
3−4
−4000%
1440p77
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
4K57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.68308.33
1440p9.08462.50
4K12.26925.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2467%
3−4
−2467%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
Battlefield 5 160
+3900%
4−5
−3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Far Cry 5 116
+11500%
1−2
−11500%
Far Cry New Dawn 113
+3667%
3−4
−3667%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+22600%
1−2
−22600%
Hitman 3 81
+1250%
6−7
−1250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1157%
14−16
−1157%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+4367%
3−4
−4367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 126
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196
+2350%
8−9
−2350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+569%
30−35
−569%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 157
+3040%
5−6
−3040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 82
+4000%
2−3
−4000%
Battlefield 5 150
+3650%
4−5
−3650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Far Cry 5 90
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
+3300%
3−4
−3300%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+22600%
1−2
−22600%
Hitman 3 79
+1217%
6−7
−1217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+1157%
14−16
−1157%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+4367%
3−4
−4367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+4800%
2−3
−4800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+1113%
8−9
−1113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+709%
10−12
−709%
Watch Dogs: Legion 211
+559%
30−35
−559%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+1160%
5−6
−1160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+2075%
4−5
−2075%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Far Cry 5 71
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+12900%
1−2
−12900%
Hitman 3 75
+1150%
6−7
−1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95
+579%
14−16
−579%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+950%
8−9
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+582%
10−12
−582%
Watch Dogs: Legion 63
+96.9%
30−35
−96.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+5850%
2−3
−5850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+3200%
2−3
−3200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+3850%
6−7
−3850%
Hitman 3 66
+843%
7−8
−843%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Metro Exodus 83
+4050%
2−3
−4050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 200
+3900%
5−6
−3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+2050%
4−5
−2050%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Far Cry New Dawn 46 0−1
Hitman 3 46
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+3760%
5−6
−3760%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 77
+3750%
2−3
−3750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 29 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%

This is how Radeon VII and FX 3700M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 4000% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 3750% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 5600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon VII is 22600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Radeon VII surpassed FX 3700M in all 47 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.17 1.18
Recency 7 February 2019 14 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 75 Watt

Radeon VII has a 3558.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX 3700M, on the other hand, has 293.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon VII is a desktop card while Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2859 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.