GeForce GT 640 OEM vs Radeon VII

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII and GeForce GT 640 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
42.74
+2414%

VII outperforms GT 640 OEM by a whopping 2414% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking96945
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.72no data
Power efficiency9.932.33
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVega 20GK107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (6 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840384
Core clock speed1400 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate420.025.50
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS0.6121 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs24032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length280 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD125
+3025%
4−5
−3025%
1440p81
+2600%
3−4
−2600%
4K60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59no data
1440p8.63no data
4K11.65no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+2900%
4−5
−2900%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+3000%
3−4
−3000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+2900%
4−5
−2900%
Battlefield 5 136
+2620%
5−6
−2620%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+3000%
3−4
−3000%
Far Cry 5 99
+3200%
3−4
−3200%
Fortnite 195
+2686%
7−8
−2686%
Forza Horizon 4 163
+2617%
6−7
−2617%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2825%
4−5
−2825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 157
+2517%
6−7
−2517%
Valorant 220−230
+2444%
9−10
−2444%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 120−130
+2900%
4−5
−2900%
Battlefield 5 137
+2640%
5−6
−2640%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2680%
10−11
−2680%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+3000%
3−4
−3000%
Dota 2 160
+2567%
6−7
−2567%
Far Cry 5 95
+3067%
3−4
−3067%
Fortnite 154
+2467%
6−7
−2467%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+2517%
6−7
−2517%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2825%
4−5
−2825%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+2675%
4−5
−2675%
Metro Exodus 88
+2833%
3−4
−2833%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 158
+2533%
6−7
−2533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+2680%
5−6
−2680%
Valorant 220−230
+2444%
9−10
−2444%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 127
+2440%
5−6
−2440%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+3000%
3−4
−3000%
Dota 2 147
+2840%
5−6
−2840%
Far Cry 5 91
+2933%
3−4
−2933%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+2500%
5−6
−2500%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+2825%
4−5
−2825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143
+2760%
5−6
−2760%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+3650%
2−3
−3650%
Valorant 197
+2714%
7−8
−2714%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 114
+2750%
4−5
−2750%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+2620%
10−11
−2620%
Grand Theft Auto V 43
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Metro Exodus 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2817%
6−7
−2817%
Valorant 260−270
+2500%
10−11
−2500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2425%
4−5
−2425%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+3067%
3−4
−3067%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+2750%
4−5
−2750%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+3400%
2−3
−3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+3650%
2−3
−3650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+2525%
4−5
−2525%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+3000%
2−3
−3000%
Metro Exodus 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Valorant 240−250
+2578%
9−10
−2578%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+3550%
2−3
−3550%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Dota 2 78
+2500%
3−4
−2500%
Far Cry 5 59
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+2467%
3−4
−2467%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 58
+2800%
2−3
−2800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 44
+4300%
1−2
−4300%

This is how Radeon VII and GT 640 OEM compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 3025% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 2600% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 2900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.74 1.70
Recency 7 February 2019 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon VII has a 2414.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

GT 640 OEM, on the other hand, has 490% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 OEM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GeForce GT 640 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2879 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon VII or GeForce GT 640 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.