GeForce GT 520 vs Radeon VII

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon VII and GeForce GT 520, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon VII
2019
16 GB HBM2, 295 Watt
43.17
+5230%

VII outperforms GT 520 by a whopping 5230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851140
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.820.01
Power efficiency10.201.95
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 20GF119
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 February 2019 (5 years ago)13 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Radeon VII has 258100% better value for money than GT 520.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384048
Core clock speed1400 MHz810 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,230 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)295 Watt29 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data102 °C
Texture fill rate420.06.480
Floating-point processing power13.44 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length280 mm145 mm
Heightno data2.7" (6.9 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB (DDR3)
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz (DDR3)
Memory bandwidth1024 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 43.17
+5230%
GT 520 0.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16654
+5255%
GT 520 311

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon VII 27449
+7123%
GT 520 380

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD123
+6050%
2−3
−6050%
1440p77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
4K57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.6829.50
1440p9.0859.00
4K12.2659.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 99
+9800%
1−2
−9800%
Battlefield 5 160
+5233%
3−4
−5233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Far Cry 5 116
+5700%
2−3
−5700%
Far Cry New Dawn 113
+5550%
2−3
−5550%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+5575%
4−5
−5575%
Hitman 3 81
+8000%
1−2
−8000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+5767%
3−4
−5767%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 126
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196
+6433%
3−4
−6433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 214
+5250%
4−5
−5250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 157
+7750%
2−3
−7750%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 82
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Battlefield 5 150
+7400%
2−3
−7400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Far Cry 5 90
+8900%
1−2
−8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
+10100%
1−2
−10100%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+5575%
4−5
−5575%
Hitman 3 79
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+5767%
3−4
−5767%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+6600%
2−3
−6600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+9700%
1−2
−9700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 211
+6933%
3−4
−6933%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Far Cry 5 71
+7000%
1−2
−7000%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+6400%
2−3
−6400%
Hitman 3 75
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+8300%
1−2
−8300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 63
+6200%
1−2
−6200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+5850%
2−3
−5850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+6500%
1−2
−6500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+5825%
4−5
−5825%
Hitman 3 66
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80
+7900%
1−2
−7900%
Metro Exodus 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+6400%
1−2
−6400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200
+6567%
3−4
−6567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+8500%
1−2
−8500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Far Cry New Dawn 46 0−1
Hitman 3 46 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+6333%
3−4
−6333%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 29 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43 0−1

This is how Radeon VII and GT 520 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon VII is 6050% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon VII is 7600% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon VII is 5600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.17 0.81
Recency 7 February 2019 13 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB (DDR3)
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 295 Watt 29 Watt

Radeon VII has a 5229.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GT 520, on the other hand, has 917.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon VII is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon VII
Radeon VII
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
GeForce GT 520

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2859 votes

Rate Radeon VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 756 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.