GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs ATI Radeon VE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1537	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	97
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	40.86
Power efficiency	no data	15.19
Architecture	Rage 6 (2000−2007)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Rage 6	TU104
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 February 2001 (23 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2560
Core clock speed	183 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	30 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	215 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.55	283.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	64
TMUs	3	160
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	183 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	2.928 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	134
1440p	no data	79
4K	no data	51

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.72
1440p	no data	6.32
4K	no data	9.78

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	19 February 2001	9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	180 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	215 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---