H200 SXM 141 GB vs Radeon RX Vega Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega MobileGH100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179216896
Core clock speedno data1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistorsno data80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,045
Floating-point processing powerno data66.91 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB141 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.36 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 700 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has 677.8% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3425% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Mobile and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook card while H200 SXM 141 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 322 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.