HD Graphics P4600 vs Radeon RX Vega XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated960
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.35
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameVega 10Haswell GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096160
Core clock speed1500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data392 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt84 Watt
Texture fill rate417.324.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs642
TMUs25620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1890 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.3
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan-1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 84 Watt

RX Vega XT has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics P4600, on the other hand, has 167.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XT and HD Graphics P4600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Radeon RX Vega XT
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 34 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.