Jetson Orin NX 8 GB vs Radeon RX Vega M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency78.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVegaGA10B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed720 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate38.0824.48
Floating-point processing powerno data1.567 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
Tensor Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt

RX Vega M has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Jetson Orin NX 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and Jetson Orin NX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop card while Jetson Orin NX 8 GB is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
Jetson Orin NX 8 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson Orin NX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.