GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 vs Radeon RX Vega M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency78.76no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVegaAD106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)April 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072
Core clock speed720 MHz1830 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08236.2
Floating-point processing powerno data15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data272.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 115 Watt

RX Vega M has 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 AD106, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and GeForce RTX 4060 AD106. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106
GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 26 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.