GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega M with GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms RX Vega M by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 330 | 193 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 78.30 | 18.17 |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Vega | TU106 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 29 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Number of transistors | 4,500 million | 10,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 38.08 | 144.0 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 4.608 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 48 |
TMUs | 32 | 120 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 240 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 30 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 336.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | - | 7.5 |
DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 55−60
−92.7%
| 106
+92.7%
|
1440p | 35−40
−97.1%
| 69
+97.1%
|
4K | 24−27
−79.2%
| 43
+79.2%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Atomic Heart | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 96
+0%
|
96
+0%
|
Fortnite | 162
+0%
|
162
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 108
+0%
|
108
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 171
+0%
|
171
+0%
|
Valorant | 223
+0%
|
223
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 104
+0%
|
104
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 118
+0%
|
118
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
Fortnite | 144
+0%
|
144
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 107
+0%
|
107
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 56
+0%
|
56
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 147
+0%
|
147
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 111
+0%
|
111
+0%
|
Valorant | 196
+0%
|
196
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 98
+0%
|
98
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 84
+0%
|
84
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 88
+0%
|
88
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60
+0%
|
60
+0%
|
Valorant | 123
+0%
|
123
+0%
|
Fortnite | 113
+0%
|
113
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
Valorant | 212
+0%
|
212
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75
+0%
|
75
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Fortnite | 74
+0%
|
74
+0%
|
Atomic Heart | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 39
+0%
|
39
+0%
|
Valorant | 171
+0%
|
171
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 87
+0%
|
87
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 38
+0%
|
38
+0%
|
Fortnite | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
This is how RX Vega M and RTX 2060 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 2060 Mobile is 93% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2060 Mobile is 97% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2060 Mobile is 79% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 17.07 | 30.36 |
Recency | 1 February 2018 | 29 January 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
RX Vega M has 666.7% lower power consumption.
RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 77.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.