Xbox One X GPU vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking454not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.49no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 22Scorpio
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)7 November 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802560
Core clock speed931 MHz1172 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million7,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88187.5
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS6.001 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs80160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s326.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.0
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 7 November 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega M GL has an age advantage of 2 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xbox One X GPU, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Xbox One X GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
AMD Xbox One X GPU
Xbox One X GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 218 votes

Rate Xbox One X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.