Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs RX Vega M GL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
10.12
+110%

RX Vega M GL outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX Vega M GL RX Vega M GL
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking450649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.71
Power efficiency10.689.43
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 22Lexa
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280512
Core clock speed931 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8839.01
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega M GL 10.12
+110%
PRO WX 2100 4.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3899
+110%
PRO WX 2100 1854

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+82.3%
75−80
−82.3%
Dota 2 65−70
+76.9%
35−40
−76.9%
Fortnite 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+140%
14−16
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+76.9%
35−40
−76.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+119%
24−27
−119%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+133%
14−16
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 140% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is ahead in 16 tests (25%)
  • there's a draw in 47 tests (75%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.12 4.81
Recency 1 February 2018 4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 110.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
RX Vega M GL Radeon RX Vega M GL
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
7300 GS Low Profile GeForce 7300 GS Low Profile
vs
FX 4500 4500
RX 6300 AMD RX 6300
vs
GeForce MX150 MX150
GTX 1060 Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1060 Mobile
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Frontier Edition
Tesla P10 Tesla P10
vs
P106-100 100
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
RX Vega M GL Vega M GL
RX 560 XT 560 XT
vs
RX 580 OEM 580 OEM
RX 560DX 560DX
vs
RX 550X 550X
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
vs
RX 580X 580X
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
HD 8950M 8950M
GeForce 845M GeForce 845M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Graphics 655

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M GL or Radeon PRO WX 2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.