Radeon HD 8310G vs RX Vega M GL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking455not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 22Scrapper Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280128
Core clock speed931 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz720 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate80.885.760
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS0.1843 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width1024 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 20 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8310G, on the other hand, has 225% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Radeon HD 8310G. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
AMD Radeon HD 8310G
Radeon HD 8310G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.