ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs RX Vega M GL

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GL with Radeon HD 4890, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GL
2018
4 GB HBM2, 65 Watt
9.88
+153%

RX Vega M GL outperforms ATI HD 4890 by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking455702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.44
Power efficiency10.431.41
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code namePolaris 22RV790
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)2 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280800
Core clock speed931 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,000 million959 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate80.8834.00
Floating-point processing power2.588 TFLOPS1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz975 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s124.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL 9.88
+153%
ATI HD 4890 3.91

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GL 3808
+153%
ATI HD 4890 1507

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.88 3.91
Recency 1 February 2018 2 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 190 Watt

RX Vega M GL has a 152.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 192.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4890 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GL is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4890 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
ATI Radeon HD 4890
Radeon HD 4890

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 86 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4890 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.