Radeon RX 480 vs RX Vega M GH

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH with Radeon RX 480, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
17.06

RX 480 outperforms RX Vega M GH by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking320250
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.81
Power efficiency11.7010.21
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 22Ellesmere
GCN generationno data4th Gen
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)29 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362304
Compute unitsno data36
Core clock speed1063 MHz1120 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1266 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate114.2182.3
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPS5.834 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs96144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s224 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI-2.0
DisplayPort support-1.4HDR

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-n/a
CrossFire-+
Enduro-n/a
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-n/a
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TressFX-+
TrueAudio-n/a
ZeroCore-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.131+
Mantle-n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.06
RX 480 22.34
+30.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6572
RX 480 8609
+31%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega M GH 14302
RX 480 17919
+25.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega M GH 10248
RX 480 12186
+18.9%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega M GH 59162
RX 480 72213
+22.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega M GH 357446
RX 480 383333
+7.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−32.2%
78
+32.2%
1440p37
−40.5%
52
+40.5%
4K29
−20.7%
35
+20.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.94
1440pno data4.40
4Kno data6.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
−31.8%
58
+31.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−30.4%
70−75
+30.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−25%
45−50
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−20%
35−40
+20%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−30%
50−55
+30%
Far Cry New Dawn 52
−13.5%
55−60
+13.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−24.1%
130−140
+24.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−23.5%
100−110
+23.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−60.3%
93
+60.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
−51.3%
55−60
+51.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
−32.5%
110
+32.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−15.5%
95−100
+15.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−145%
93
+145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%
Battlefield 5 33
−45.5%
48
+45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−30%
50−55
+30%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+32.3%
31
−32.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−24.1%
130−140
+24.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−23.5%
100−110
+23.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−34.5%
78
+34.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
−22.9%
55−60
+22.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−25.6%
45−50
+25.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−15.5%
95−100
+15.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
−66.7%
35
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−114%
45−50
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−12.5%
45
+12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+40.3%
77
−40.3%
Hitman 3 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
−87.5%
100−110
+87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
−31.6%
75−80
+31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
−29.4%
44
+29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−15.5%
95−100
+15.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
−111%
55−60
+111%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−66.7%
65
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−61.5%
42
+61.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−35.3%
21−24
+35.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
−92.3%
24−27
+92.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−50%
30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−37%
120−130
+37%
Hitman 3 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−12.2%
45−50
+12.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−61.3%
50
+61.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−42.4%
45−50
+42.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−25.2%
120−130
+25.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−32.1%
35−40
+32.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
−72.2%
31
+72.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
−50%
21
+50%
Hitman 3 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+45%
60
−45%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−47.1%
25
+47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−58.8%
27
+58.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−70%
17
+70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−66.7%
15
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−44.4%
24−27
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%

This is how RX Vega M GH and RX 480 compete in popular games:

  • RX 480 is 32% faster in 1080p
  • RX 480 is 41% faster in 1440p
  • RX 480 is 21% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega M GH is 45% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 480 is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
  • RX 480 is ahead in 68 tests (94%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.06 22.34
Recency 1 February 2018 29 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega M GH has an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% lower power consumption.

RX 480, on the other hand, has a 30.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega M GH in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook card while Radeon RX 480 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1845 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.