Radeon R5 A320 vs RX Vega M GH

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking316not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.90no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 22Jet
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536320
Core clock speed1063 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate114.216.50
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs9620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX Vega M GH has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and Radeon R5 A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook card while Radeon R5 A320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
AMD Radeon R5 A320
Radeon R5 A320

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.