Trace: try redirect_from
Trace: select _id, title from ss_cards where redirect_to=4451
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 305 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | TU104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 10 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 201.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 3.656 gflops | 6.451 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 229 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2018 | 10 January 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 160 Watt |
RX Vega M GH has 60% lower power consumption.
RTX 2060 TU104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GH and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M GH is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
