Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega M GH and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega M GH
2018
4 GB HBM2, 100 Watt
17.06
+28.4%

RX Vega M GH outperforms Arc Graphics 140V by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking319385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.69no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe² (2024)
GPU code namePolaris 22Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15368
Core clock speed1063 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1190 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate114.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GH 17.06
+28.4%
Arc Graphics 140V 13.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega M GH 6572
+28.4%
Arc Graphics 140V 5120

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega M GH 14302
+33.8%
Arc Graphics 140V 10688

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega M GH 10248
+8%
Arc Graphics 140V 9492

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega M GH 59162
+11.6%
Arc Graphics 140V 53014

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega M GH 2908
Arc Graphics 140V 4038
+38.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+47.5%
40
−47.5%
1440p37
+85%
20
−85%
4K29
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+30%
30−33
−30%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+40%
40−45
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 52
+30%
40−45
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%
Hitman 3 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Battlefield 5 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%
Hitman 3 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+30.8%
65−70
−30.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+36%
50−55
−36%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%
Hitman 3 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
+40%
40−45
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+31.4%
70−75
−31.4%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+28.8%
80−85
−28.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

This is how RX Vega M GH and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GH is 48% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GH is 85% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GH is 38% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.06 13.29
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

RX Vega M GH has a 28.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GH on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.