GeForce GTX 675M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GTX 675M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.02
+2.6%

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) outperforms GTX 675M SLI by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking476484
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Power efficiency41.823.06
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVegaN12E-GTX2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speedno data620 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt2x 100 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data3000 MHz
Shared memory--

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.02
+2.6%
GTX 675M SLI 8.79

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5891
GTX 675M SLI 6407
+8.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 22428
+21.9%
GTX 675M SLI 18405

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
1440p16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
4K10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Hitman 3 15
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Metro Exodus 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Hitman 3 15
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Metro Exodus 25
−8%
27−30
+8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+1.7%
55−60
−1.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Hitman 3 14
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
−108%
50−55
+108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−26.1%
27−30
+26.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−78.6%
24−27
+78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−392%
55−60
+392%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+175%
4−5
−175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.3%
35−40
−8.3%
Hitman 3 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+5.4%
55−60
−5.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+8.8%
30−35
−8.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GTX 675M SLI compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 5% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 14% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 175% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 392% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 42 tests (58%)
  • GTX 675M SLI is ahead in 14 tests (19%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.02 8.79
Recency 7 January 2020 6 January 2011
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 2 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 2.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 675M SLI, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and GeForce GTX 675M SLI.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1101 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.