Arc A380 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
9.05

Arc A380 outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481334
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.12
Power efficiency41.3614.75
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameVegaDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speedno data2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2100 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data131.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.198 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9.05
Arc A380 16.14
+78.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5891
Arc A380 13892
+136%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 22428
Arc A380 53979
+141%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 3743
Arc A380 10174
+172%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 27084
Arc A380 60804
+125%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 299071
Arc A380 466666
+56%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
−114%
47
+114%
1440p16
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
4K9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17
1440pno data5.52
4Kno data9.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−177%
61
+177%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20
−150%
50
+150%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−246%
95−100
+246%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−221%
60−65
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−219%
65−70
+219%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−192%
75−80
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−169%
160−170
+169%
Hitman 3 15
−313%
60−65
+313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−159%
130−140
+159%
Metro Exodus 35
−189%
100−110
+189%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−127%
75−80
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 36
−186%
100−110
+186%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−88.3%
110−120
+88.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−227%
72
+227%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−131%
37
+131%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−246%
95−100
+246%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−221%
60−65
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−219%
65−70
+219%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−192%
75−80
+192%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−169%
160−170
+169%
Hitman 3 15
−313%
60−65
+313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−159%
130−140
+159%
Metro Exodus 25
−304%
100−110
+304%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−200%
75−80
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27
−196%
80
+196%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−152%
60−65
+152%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−88.3%
110−120
+88.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−31.8%
29
+31.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14
−121%
31
+121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−221%
60−65
+221%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−219%
65−70
+219%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+7%
57
−7%
Hitman 3 14
−343%
60−65
+343%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
−117%
52
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−165%
61
+165%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−143%
34
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
−108%
25
+108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−257%
75−80
+257%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−211%
55−60
+211%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−244%
30−35
+244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−182%
30−35
+182%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−338%
170−180
+338%
Hitman 3 10
−260%
35−40
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−210%
60−65
+210%
Metro Exodus 17
−235%
55−60
+235%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−325%
65−70
+325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−171%
160−170
+171%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−285%
50−55
+285%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−303%
140−150
+303%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−467%
30−35
+467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−280%
18−20
+280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−273%
40−45
+273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−322%
35−40
+322%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%

This is how RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 114% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A380 is 69% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A380 is 78% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 7% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 467% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 65 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.05 16.14
Recency 7 January 2020 14 June 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 78.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1183 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 836 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.