RTX TITAN Ada Generation vs Radeon RX Vega 7
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 529 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 12 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Vega (2017−2020) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Vega Raven Ridge | AD102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 18432 |
| Boost clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 76,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 800 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 1,452 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 92.9 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 336 mm |
| Width | no data | Quad-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6X |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 24 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 1,152 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 800 Watt |
RX Vega 7 has 5233.3% lower power consumption.
RTX TITAN Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 75% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 7 and RTX TITAN Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook card while RTX TITAN Ada Generation is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
