ATI Radeon 8500 vs RX Vega 64

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	127	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.96	no data
Power efficiency	8.76	no data
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	Vega 10	R200
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 August 2017 (7 years ago)	14 August 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	no data
Core clock speed	1247 MHz	275 MHz
Boost clock speed	1546 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	12,500 million	60 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	23 Watt
Texture fill rate	395.8	2.200
Floating-point processing power	12.66 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	4
TMUs	256	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	279 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	945 MHz	275 MHz
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	8.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.125	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	7 August 2017	14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	23 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---