Radeon RX 7600 XT vs RX Vega 64 Nano

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated79
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data77.65
Power efficiencyno data16.34
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed1156 MHz1980 MHz
Boost clock speed1247 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate319.2352.6
Floating-point processing powerno data22.57 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length152 mm204 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 190 Watt

RX 7600 XT has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano and Radeon RX 7600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 515 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.