Radeon Pro 575X vs RX Vega 64 Liquid

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)18 March 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed1406 MHz1096 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate429.3140.3
Floating-point processing powerno data4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs256128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1700 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s217.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 18 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 120 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
AMD Radeon Pro 575X
Radeon Pro 575X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 23 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.