T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.40
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096896
Core clock speed1406 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1677 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate429.378.12
Floating-point processing powerno data2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 50 Watt

RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition and T1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition is a desktop card while T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 61 vote

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.