Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 255 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 24.75 |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
GPU code name | Vega 10 | TU106 |
Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 7 August 2017 (7 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 1408 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1668 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 10,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 345 Watt | 60 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 427.0 | 175.0 |
Floating-point processing power | 13.66 TFLOPS | 5.599 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 64 | 64 |
TMUs | 256 | 144 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 288 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 282 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 945 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | - |
G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 August 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 345 Watt | 60 Watt |
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RTX 3000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 475% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling and Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.