Arc 130T Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking597not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.70no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe2-LPG (2025)
GPU code nameVega RenoirArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data123.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.942 TFLOPS
ROPsno data28
TMUsno data56
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data7

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2020 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Arc 130T Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Arc 130T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Intel Arc 130T Mobile
Arc 130T

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 716 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc 130T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Arc 130T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.