UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
2.98

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking781655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.95no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.80no data
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2.98
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.62
+55%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2991
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168
+5.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8189
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
+66.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2245
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495
+11.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 16787
+6.8%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 94451
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 112966
+19.6%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 552
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 658
+19.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−20%
18
+20%
1440p16−18
−56.3%
25
+56.3%
4K7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10
−50%
15
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−66.7%
10
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Battlefield 5 12
−50%
18
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−133%
14
+133%
Fortnite 19
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
Forza Horizon 4 10
−110%
21−24
+110%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Valorant 45−50
−23.9%
55−60
+23.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 32
−144%
75−80
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 38
+5.6%
36
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−117%
13
+117%
Fortnite 10
−160%
24−27
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−10%
11
+10%
Metro Exodus 3
−167%
8−9
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−77.8%
16
+77.8%
Valorant 45−50
−23.9%
55−60
+23.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−50%
15
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 31
−6.5%
33
+6.5%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Valorant 45−50
−23.9%
55−60
+23.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−61.9%
30−35
+61.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−40.9%
30−35
+40.9%
Valorant 27−30
−71.4%
45−50
+71.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
−50%
12
+50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 20% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 56% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 71% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 6% faster.
  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 58 tests (92%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.98 4.62
Recency 7 January 2018 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 55% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 72 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) or UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.