Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Arc 7-Cores iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
2018
15 Watt
3.05

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a whopping 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking772320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.00no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.80no data
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3.05
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.26
+466%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2991
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795
+294%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8189
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592
+371%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2245
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449
+276%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 16787
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644
+172%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−143%
34
+143%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−718%
90
+718%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Elden Ring 6−7
−800%
50−55
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−600%
55−60
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−427%
58
+427%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−344%
70−75
+344%
Metro Exodus 8
−463%
45−50
+463%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
−310%
40−45
+310%
Valorant 13
−431%
65−70
+431%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−600%
55−60
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−182%
31
+182%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Dota 2 19
−274%
71
+274%
Elden Ring 6−7
−800%
50−55
+800%
Far Cry 5 15
−127%
34
+127%
Fortnite 9
−944%
90−95
+944%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−407%
70−75
+407%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−130%
23
+130%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
−300%
120−130
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−273%
40−45
+273%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−373%
52
+373%
Valorant 1−2
−6800%
65−70
+6800%
World of Tanks 32
−563%
210−220
+563%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−600%
55−60
+600%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Dota 2 31
−113%
66
+113%
Far Cry 5 13
−169%
35
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−492%
70−75
+492%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−329%
120−130
+329%
Valorant 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Elden Ring 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
World of Tanks 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Valorant 10−11
−450%
55−60
+450%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−463%
90−95
+463%
Elden Ring 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−93.3%
27−30
+93.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 16−18
−81.3%
27−30
+81.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−633%
21−24
+633%
Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 24−27
Valorant 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 143% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 6800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 40 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.05 17.26
Recency 7 January 2018 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 465.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 71 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 51 vote

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.