GeForce 7950 GX2 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 5 with GeForce 7950 GX2, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 5
2020
15 Watt
4.65
+794%

RX Vega 5 outperforms 7950 GX2 by a whopping 794% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking6481232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameVegaG71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2020 (4 years ago)5 June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed1400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data278 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data270 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+900%
2−3
−900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9
+800%
1−2
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Hitman 3 8 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Metro Exodus 20
+900%
2−3
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Hitman 3 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Metro Exodus 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Hitman 3 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
+800%
1−2
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1

This is how RX Vega 5 and 7950 GX2 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 5 is 900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.65 0.52
Recency 7 January 2020 5 June 2006
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

RX Vega 5 has a 794.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7950 GX2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 5 is a notebook card while GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5
NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GX2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 212 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 56 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.