ATI VGA Wonder vs Radeon RX Vega 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking792not rated
Place by popularity89not in top-100
Power efficiency13.53no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Wonder (1990−1992)
GPU code namePicasso18800-1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)5 February 1990 (35 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1001 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.01no data
Floating-point processing power0.3844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 KB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 5 February 1990
Chip lithography 14 nm 800 nm

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 28 years, and a 5614.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 3 and VGA Wonder. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook card while VGA Wonder is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3
ATI VGA Wonder
VGA Wonder

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2056 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 17 votes

Rate VGA Wonder on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 3 or VGA Wonder, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.