Quadro K2000 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 with Quadro K2000, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.48
+33.7%

RX Vega 11 outperforms K2000 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking607692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.41
Power efficiency10.735.51
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRavenGK107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)1 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704384
Core clock speed300 MHz954 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt51 Watt
Texture fill rate55.0430.53
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data202 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.3+
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.48
+33.7%
Quadro K2000 4.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2111
+33.5%
Quadro K2000 1581

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
1440p6
+50%
4−5
−50%
4K9
+50%
6−7
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data33.28
1440pno data149.75
4Kno data99.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+36.9%
65−70
−36.9%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 29
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

This is how RX Vega 11 and Quadro K2000 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 44% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.48 4.10
Recency 10 May 2018 1 March 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 51 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 33.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 45.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while Quadro K2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Quadro K2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1778 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 215 votes

Rate Quadro K2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.