UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon RX Vega 10
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX Vega 10 with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics 750 outperforms RX Vega 10 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 685 | 662 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 29.19 | 20.70 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Raven | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 8 January 2019 (6 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1301 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 52.04 | 20.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.665 TFLOPS | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 40 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 17
−5.9%
| 18−20
+5.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9
−33.3%
|
12−14
+33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 11
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 11
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 17
−11.8%
|
18−20
+11.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 19
+35.7%
|
14−16
−35.7%
|
| Valorant | 22
+144%
|
9−10
−144%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 18
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
| Elden Ring | 7
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 17
−35.3%
|
21−24
+35.3%
|
| Fortnite | 15
−73.3%
|
24−27
+73.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14
−35.7%
|
18−20
+35.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
−40%
|
14−16
+40%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 48
+23.1%
|
35−40
−23.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
| World of Tanks | 42
−78.6%
|
75−80
+78.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 29
−3.4%
|
30−33
+3.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
−21.1%
|
21−24
+21.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12
−58.3%
|
18−20
+58.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−5.4%
|
35−40
+5.4%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−3.4%
|
30−33
+3.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 30−33
−6.7%
|
30−35
+6.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−8.3%
|
12−14
+8.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
This is how RX Vega 10 and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 is 6% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 10 is 144% faster.
- in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 10 is ahead in 6 tests (12%)
- UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 30 tests (58%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (31%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.24 | 4.51 |
| Recency | 8 January 2019 | 30 March 2021 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
RX Vega 10 has 50% lower power consumption.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 6.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX Vega 10 and UHD Graphics 750.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
