Radeon Instinct MI300 vs RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking679not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64014080
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate52.001,496
Floating-point performance1.664 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 600 Watt

RX Vega 10 has 3900% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Radeon Instinct MI300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1035 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 25 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.