GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Radeon RX Vega 10

Place in the ranking	685	944
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.19	2.30
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Raven	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2019 (6 years ago)	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	192
Core clock speed	300 MHz	875 MHz
Boost clock speed	1301 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,940 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.04	14.00
Floating-point processing power	1.665 TFLOPS	0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	40	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	1 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	891 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

17
+183%

6−7

−183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9 +200%	3−4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Elden Ring	11 +175%	4−5 −175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	11 +175%	4−5 −175%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	17 +183%	6−7 −183%
Metro Exodus	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
Valorant	22 +175%	8−9 −175%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16 +167%	6−7 −167%
Counter-Strike 2	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	2	0−1
Dota 2	18 +157%	7−8 −157%
Elden Ring	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	17 +183%	6−7 −183%
Fortnite	15 +200%	5−6 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +180%	5−6 −180%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
Metro Exodus	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	48 +167%	18−20 −167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Valorant	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
World of Tanks	42 +163%	16−18 −163%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Dota 2	29 +190%	10−11 −190%
Far Cry 5	19 +171%	7−8 −171%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +164%	14−16 −164%
Valorant	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Elden Ring	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +190%	10−11 −190%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
World of Tanks	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Valorant	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Elden Ring	2−3	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Dota 2	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Fortnite	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Valorant	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

This is how RX Vega 10 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

RX Vega 10 is 183% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.24	1.67
Recency	8 January 2019	24 April 2012
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	50 Watt

RX Vega 10 has a 153.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 10 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.