GeForce 6600 GT AGP vs Radeon RX Vega 10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking679not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameVega Raven RidgeNV43 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 October 2017 (6 years ago)14 November 2004 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate52.004.000
Floating-point performance1.664 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data950 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data15.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 October 2017 14 November 2004
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 47 Watt

RX Vega 10 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 10 and GeForce 6600 GT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 10 is a notebook card while GeForce 6600 GT AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10
NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT AGP
GeForce 6600 GT AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1036 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 22 votes

Rate GeForce 6600 GT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.